![]() Ĭhan KMA, Guerry AD, Balvanera P et al (2012) Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. Ĭampagne CS, Roche PK, Salles JM (2018) Looking into Pandora’s Box: ecosystem disservices assessment and correlations with ecosystem services. Ĭáceres NC, Bornschein MR, Lopes WH, Percequillo AR (2007) Mammals of the Bodoquena Mountains, southwestern Brazil: an ecological and conservation analysis. īuijs AE, Arts BJM, Elands BHM, Lengkeek J (2011) Beyond environmental frames: the social representation and cultural resonance of nature in conflicts over a Dutch woodland. īuijs A, Jacobs M (2021) Avoiding negativity bias: towards a positive psychology of human–wildlife relationships. īoyd J, Banzhaf S (2007) What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. īlanco J, Sourdril A, Deconchat M et al (2020b) How farmers feel about trees: perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices associated with rural forests in southwestern France. ![]() īlanco J, Moreau C, Guerbois C et al (2020a) La biodiversité, une ressource, mais aussi un fardeau ? Intérêt et limites des notions de services et disservices écosystémiques pour repenser les interactions nature-sociétés dans les territoires ruraux. ![]() īlanco J, Sourdril A, Deconchat M et al (2019b) Social drivers of rural forest dynamics: a multi-scale approach combining ethnography, geomatic and mental model analysis. īlanco J, Dendoncker N, Barnaud C, Sirami C (2019a) Ecosystem disservices matter: Towards their systematic integration within ecosystem service research and policy. īarot S, Yé L, Abbadie L et al (2017) Ecosystem services must tackle anthropized ecosystems and ecological engineering. īarnaud C, Corbera E, Muradian R et al (2018) Ecosystem services, social interdependencies, and collective action: a conceptual framework. īarnaud C, Antona M (2014) Deconstructing ecosystem services: uncertainties and controversies around a socially constructed concept. Īllaire JJ, Gandrud C, Russell K, Yetman CJ (2017) networkD3: D3 JavaScript Network Graphs from RĪngo TG, Börjeson L, Senbeta F, Hylander K (2014) Balancing ecosystem services and disservices: smallholder farmers’ use and management of forest and trees in an agricultural landscape in southwestern Ethiopia. Based on this case study, this novel cascade model seems a promising conceptual tool to uncover the interactions between ES and EDS, opening new research and policy avenues to support sustainability.Īinscough J, de Vries LA, Metzger M et al (2019) Navigating pluralism: understanding perceptions of the ecosystem services concept. Additionally, the model allowed a window on the diverse preventive and regulating practices that the interviewed farmers have adopted to cope with increasing EDS without necessarily harming biodiversity. The model also revealed a vicious circle between crop expansion, a resulting decrease in certain ES and an increase in certain EDS, which might exacerbate tensions between agriculture and forest conservation in the future. Using the model in comprehensive interviews with farmers about their perceptions and management practices of forests, we found that they had an overall positive valuation of forests, but identified both positive and negative interactions between forests and farms at different organizational levels. In order to explore the potential and limitations of this model, we then applied it in a Brazilian landscape where reconciling agriculture and forest conservation is a critical sustainability challenge. To this end, we devised a novel cascade model that helps to define ES and EDS in a multi-level context that considers both as coproduced by ecosystems and people. This study aimed to develop these joint assessments and test their relevance in addressing sustainability issues. However, joint ES and EDS assessments remain rare in sustainability research, partly because of the persisting conceptual ambiguity around the EDS concept. Yet as ecosystem services (ES) focus on nature’s positive contributions to people, some have argued that ‘ecosystem disservices’ (EDS), or nature’s negative contributions, should also be taken into account to better orient sustainability policies. The ecosystem service framework has been instrumental in navigating local to global sustainability issues.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |